P.045 Biopsies of the transverse carpal ligament and tenosynovium for tissue confirmation of transthyretin amyloidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Transthyretin Amyloidosis (ATTR) is a common cause of both cardiomyopathy and carpal tunnel syndrome, with many patients needing carpal tunnel release (CTR). Although tafamidis is now an approved treatment of ATTR cardiomyopathy, insurers in most provinces require biopsy confirmation of amyloidosis. Endomyocardial biopsy is often the chosen approach due to optimal sensitivity, albeit with risk of serious adverse events such as stroke, cardiac tamponade, and arrhythmias. CTR may present an ideal opportunity for obtaining amyloidosis biopsy confirmation. Methods: ATTR patients undergoing CTR had biopsy of their transverse carpal ligament (TCL) and/or flexor tenosynovium to assess the sensitivity of both sites for biopsy confirmation of amyloidosis. Results: Twelve patients consecutively underwent biopsies during CTR, with 4 (33%) having bilateral CTR and biopsy. Among 16 TCL biopsies and 14 tenosynovium biopsies, 100% demonstrated amyloid deposition. Another patient had isolated tenosynovium biopsy without CTR and also demonstrated amyloidosis. There were no serious adverse events, and 1/13 (8%) had wound dehiscence requiring repeat suturing. Conclusions: Biopsy of the TCL and/or tenosynovium during CTR is safe, cost-effective, and sensitive, and may represent an alternative to endomyocardial biopsy in patients requiring tissue confirmation for tafamidis approval. ATTR patients eligible for tafamidis may benefit from early neurology assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".