MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283368672 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19424219.v1

Wi-Fi And Bluetooth Contact Tracing Without User Intervention

2022· preprint· en· W4283368672 on OpenAlexafffund
Brosnan Yuen, Yifeng Bie, Duncan Cairns, Geoffrey Harper, Jason Xu, Charles B. Chang, Xiaodai Dong, Tao Lü

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCOVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefense Threat Reduction AgencyNvidia
KeywordsBluetoothRouterComputer scienceWirelessNetwork packetComputer networkTracingTransmission (telecommunications)Track (disk drive)Real-time computingMobile deviceTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A custom Wi-Fi and Bluetooth contact tracing system is created to find detailed paths of infected individuals without any user intervention. The system tracks smartphones, but it does not require smartphone applications, connecting to the routers, or any other extraneous devices on the users. A custom Turtlebot3 is used for site surveying, where it simulates mobile device movement and packet transmission. Transmit power, receive power, and round trip time are collected by a custom ESP32C3 router. MAC randomization is defeated to identify unique smartphones. Subsequently, the wireless parameters above are converted to signal path loss and time of flight. Bidirectional long short term memory takes the wireless parameters and predicts the detailed paths of the users within 1 m. Public health authorities can use the contact tracing website to find the detailed paths of the suspected cases using the smartphone models and initial positions of confirm cases. The system can also track indirect contact transmissions originating from surfaces and droplets due to having absolute positions of users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCOVID-19 Digital Contact TracingFrench-language works237,207