Structure and dynamics of a laminar separation bubble near a wing root: towards reconstructing the complete LSB topology on a finite wing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of the wing root junction on the laminar separation bubble forming on the suction surface of a semispan NACA 0018 wing cantilevered from the wind tunnel test section wall is studied using surface flow visualisations, particle image velocimetry and surface pressure measurements at a chord Reynolds number of 125 000 and an angle of attack of 6 $^\circ$ . The test section wall boundary layer upstream of the wing is turbulent, and the spanwise influence of the junction on the separation bubble extends well beyond the test section wall boundary layer thickness. Substantial three-dimensionality is seen in the separation bubble flowfield near the wing root, where earlier transition and a reduction in separation bubble thickness is observed. In contrast with the wing tip, earlier transition and a reduction in separation bubble length occurs near the wing root. Outside of the junction affected region, the separation bubble is similar to separation bubbles forming on two-dimensional geometries, and displays mild spanwise waviness. The transition process away from the end affected regions is characterised by the formation of spanwise roll-up vortices that are shed in a nearly two-dimensional manner across the span. The analysis of the results shows that, near the wing root, the increased level of perturbations leads to earlier vortex roll-up and spanwise flow contributes to more rapid vortex breakdown. The results in the wing root region are complemented by the analysis of data from Toppings and Yarusevych ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 929, 2021, A39) in the wing tip region to provide a more holistic outlook on the laminar separation bubble topology and dynamics on the entire finite wing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".