MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283373855 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2022.219

P.131 Acute subdural hematoma in obstetric patients following epidural anesthesia

2022· article· en· W4283373855 on OpenAlexaffvenue
K Marciniuk, K Meguro

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical Imaging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpidural blood patchPost-dural-puncture headacheHematomaSurgeryComplicationAnesthesiaAbducens nervePalsyEtiologySpinal anesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Post-dural puncture headache is a known complication of neuraxial anesthesia and acute subdural hematoma has been associated with unintentional dural puncture. Notably, a significant number of unintentional dural punctures remain unidentified. We present two contrasting cases of subdural hematoma (SDH) following labour epidural anesthesia with no sign of dural puncture at time of anesthesia. Patient 1 presented with headache post-partum day (PPD) six, SDH was identified PPD23, and blood-patch treatment performed PPD35. Patient 2 presented with headache immediately, had SDH identified PPD3, and placement of blood-patch PPD4. Methods: The cases are presented and the literature was reviewed for prior cases. Results: Patient 1 developed significant bilateral SDH with severe headache and right abducens palsy. Headache resolved post blood patch however surgical evacuation was required and the abducens palsy persisted. Patient 2 experienced resolution of symptoms two days post blood patch, the small unilateral SDH was managed conservatively, and had no neurological deficits. Conclusions: Headache is common in the postpartum period. The majority are primary etiology and benign. SDH is a rare but serious complication of neuraxial anesthesia, and the consequences may be devastating. Rapid identification and early treatment are essential to avoid severe neurological sequelae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicNeurosurgical Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207