P.157 Adjunctive treatment of chronic subdural hematoma with middle meningeal artery embolization – is the left side more common?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Embolization of middle meningeal artery (EMMA) is an emerging treatment for CSDH and a method to decrease CSDH recurrence. We report a single Canadian center experience of EMMA for the management of CSDH. Methods: Consecutive EMMA patients during the period July 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively included in this series. EMMA procedures were performed using polyvinyl alcohol particles or liquid embolic agent. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically as per standard of care. Results: A total of 20 patients CSDH (mean 65.6 years; range 14-85 yrs; male 16) underwent 20 EMMA procedures. CSDH occured on the left in 13 patients, right in 4 patients and bilateral in 3 patients. No patients had periprocedural complications. There was no recurrence of CSDH on the EMMA treated side. The mean SDH size decreased from 18.4 +/- 6.34 mm at the time of presentation to 5.31 +/ 3.84 mm at last follow up. The proportion of patients with an mRS of 2 or less increased from 65% to 76%. Conclusions: EMMA was found to be effective and safe in the management of CSDH with no evidence of recurrence on the treated side. Left sided hematomas appear to be more common that right sided hematomas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".