MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283384359 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000677

Time for a new global roadmap for supporting evidence into action

2022· article· en· W4283384359 on OpenAlexaff
Tanja Kuchenmüller, John N. Lavis, Mehrnaz Kheirandish, Ludovic Revéiz, Marge Reinap, Joseph Okeibunor, Siswanto Siswanto, Arash Rashidian, Samuel Sieber, Kaelan A. Moat, Cristián Mansilla, Fadi El‐Jardali, Matthias Helble, John C. Reeder, Evelina Chapman, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Ahmed Mandil, Soumya Swaminathan

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Global Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsAction (physics)Process managementBusinessPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.220
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.348
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2200.348
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.012
Bibliometrics0.0110.007
Science and technology studies0.0080.019
Scholarly communication0.0360.067
Open science0.0110.033
Research integrity0.0820.071
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Global Public HealthSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207