MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization and Dynamics of Residual Organics in Oil Sands Fluid Fine Tailings

2022· article· en· W4283392669 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohammadhasan Sasar, Cliff T. Johnston, Marika Santagata

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada's Oil Sands Innovation Alliance
KeywordsTailingsExtraction (chemistry)Oil sandsAsphalteneFourier transform infrared spectroscopyFlocculationResidual oilFraction (chemistry)ChemistryAsphaltThermogravimetric analysisEnvironmental chemistryChemical engineeringMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluid fine tailings (FFTs) generated by the surface mining of oil sand ore bodies are high-water-content, clay-rich materials that contain unrecovered bitumen and additional residual organics, including solvents used during bitumen extraction. Despite a large accumulated inventory of these tailings and despite the environmental implications and challenges that the presence of organics poses, little is known about the differences in the residual organics generated by different bitumen extraction processes and about the effects of polymeric flocculation on mineral–organic interactions. This study investigated residual organics in two compositionally different FFTs both before and after flocculation with a commercially available polyacrylamide polymer. Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and evolved gas analysis (EGA-TG-FTIR) were used to characterize the makeup of total organics, free bitumen, and mineral-associated organics. These observations highlighted distinct differences between the FFTs. Relative to the sample receiving waste only from the bitumen extraction process (FFT-1), the FFT sample that received waste from both the extraction and the froth treatment processes (FFT-2) exhibited a higher residual organic content and a larger fraction of lower-molecular-mass organic substances and showed a proportionally smaller release of free bitumen as a result of the washing process, evidence of a higher fraction of mineral-associated organics. Moreover, TG and FTIR analyses showed that the free bitumen released from both FFTs contained a higher fraction of lighter organics and was characterized by a more ordered molecular structure compared to the remaining organics. Finally, the study also found that the bitumen release characteristics of FFT-1 were fundamentally different from those of FFT-2. Bitumen release continued to be observed from both FFTs after polymeric flocculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207