Identifying Endogenous Cellular Proteins Destabilizing the Propagation of Swi1 Prion upon Overproduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Background: Numerous prions exist in the budding yeast, including [SWI+], the prion form of Swi1—a subunit of the chromatin-remodeling complex SWI/SNF. Despite decades of research, the molecular mechanisms underlying prion initiation and propagation are not fully understood. In this study, we aimed to identify endogenous cellular proteins that destabilize [SWI+]. (2) Methods: We screened the MoBY-ORF 2.0 library for proteins that destabilize [SWI+] upon overproduction. We further explored the effects of the identified candidates against other yeast prions and analyzed their potential prion-curing mechanisms. (3) Results: Eighty-two [SWI+] suppressors were identified, and their effects were shown to be [SWI+]-specific. Interestingly, a few documented [SWI+] suppressors were not among the identified hits. Further experiments indicate that, for some of these [SWI+] suppressors, their overproduction, and thus their prion-curing activities, are regulated by environmental conditions. Bioinformatics analyses show that our identified [SWI+] suppressors are involved in diverse biological functions, with gene ontology term enrichments specifically for transcriptional regulation and translation. Competition for Swi1 monomers between [SWI+] and Swi1 interactors, including the SWI/SNF complex, is a potential prion-curing mechanism. (4) Conclusions: We identified a number of [SWI+]-specific suppressors that highlight unique features of [SWI+] in maintaining its self-perpetuating conformations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".