Association of Severe Obesity and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Pneumonia Following Non-Cardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Pneumonia is the third most common surgical complication after urinary tract infection and wound infections. In addition to increased mortality, patients who develop postoperative pneumonia have a higher risk of prolonged hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and higher healthcare costs. Obesity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are both independent risk factors for the development and severity of postoperative pneumonia, although the combined effect of these comorbidities is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated whether the combination of severe obesity and COPD is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia. Methods: ) and underwent general surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology surgery, urology surgery, and vascular surgery in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participating hospitals from 2014 to 2018. We evaluated the combined effect of COPD and severe obesity on the risk for postoperative pneumonia, unplanned tracheal reintubation, and extended length of stay. Results: The co-occurrence of severe obesity and COPD appeared to have a protective effect on the risk of postoperative pneumonia. In the presence of COPD, patients with severe obesity were 14% less likely to develop pneumonia compared to their normal-weight counterparts (2.9% vs. 4.4%; adjusted relative risk (RR): 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60, 0.95). In addition, in the presence of COPD, severe obesity conferred a lower risk for requiring an extended length of stay (37.6% vs. 47.9%; adjusted RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.89). Conclusions: Counterintuitively, the co-occurrence of severe obesity with COPD appeared to buffer the negative impact of COPD on postoperative pneumonia, unplanned tracheal reintubation, and prolonged hospital stay after noncardiac surgery. These findings are consistent with the obesity paradox and warrant further investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".