MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283645165 · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.06.017

Liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography improves outcome prediction in primary biliary cholangitis

2022· article· en· W4283645165 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Corpechot, Fabrice Carrat, Farid Gaouar, Frédéric Chau, Gideon M. Hirschfield, Aliya Gulamhusein, Aldo J. Montaño‐Loza, Ellina Lytvyak, Christoph Schramm, Albert Parés, Ignasi Olivas, John E. Eaton, Karim T. Osman, George Ν. Dalekos, Nikolaos Gatselis, Frederik Nevens, Nora Cazzagon, Alessandra Zago, Francesco Paolo Russo, Nadir Abbas, Palak Trivedi, Douglas Thorburn, Francesca Saffioti, László Barkai, Davide Roccarina, Vincenza Calvaruso, A. Fichera, Adèle Delamarre, Esli Medina‐Morales, Alan Bonder, Vilas Patwardhan, Cristina Rigamonti, Marco Carbone, Pietro Invernizzi, Laura Cristoferi, Adriaan van der Meer, Rozanne de Veer, Ehud Zigmond, Eyal Yehezkel, Andreas E. Kremer, Ansgar Deibel, Jérôme Dumortier, Tony Bruns, Karsten Große, Georges‐Philippe Pageaux, Aaron Wetten, Jessica Dyson, David G. Jones, Olivier Chazouillères, Bettina Hansen, Victor de Lédinghen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hepatology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoCanada Research ChairsUniversity Health Network
FundersMedical Research CouncilGrifolsSwedish Orphan BiovitrumInventiva PharmaGlaxoSmithKlineNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchFalk Foundation
KeywordsTransient elastographyMedicineInternal medicineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelLiver transplantationGastroenterologyClinical endpointConfidence intervalRetrospective cohort studySurgeryTransplantationLiver fibrosisFibrosisRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HepatologySame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207