MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283651846 · doi:10.5194/ems2022-99

Tropospheric weather influenced by solar wind coupling to the magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere system

2022· preprint· en· W4283651846 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Prikryl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronal mass ejectionAtmospheric sciencesExtratropical cycloneEnvironmental scienceIonosphereSolar windAtmosphere (unit)MeteorologyPhysicsGeophysicsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme weather events caused by intensification of tropical and extratropical cyclones can have destructive impacts on infrastructure, society, and environment. Forecasting extreme weather continues to present challenges. In this study, we consider possible external factors that can lead to severe weather. It has been shown that significant weather events, including explosive extratropical cyclones [1,2], rapid intensification of tropical cyclones [3], and heavy rainfall causing floods and flash floods [4,5] tend to follow arrivals of solar wind high-speed streams from coronal holes. To further support these results, we use the NOAA Storm Prediction Center database of tornadoes in the superposed epoch analysis to study the occurrence of tornado outbreaks relative to arrival time of solar wind disturbances caused by solar activity. This includes solar flares that can launch coronal mass ejections [6], coronal holes that are sources of high-speed streams, and high-density plasma adjacent to the heliospheric current sheet where the interplanetary magnetic field reverses its polarity [7]. Solar wind coupling to the magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere system generates globally propagating atmospheric gravity waves [8,9] that can reach the troposphere with attenuated amplitudes but are subject to amplification upon over-reflection in the troposphere. These atmospheric gravity waves can trigger/release moist instabilities leading to convection and latent heat release, which is the energy driving the storms [10]. [1] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 149, 219–231, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2016.04.002 [2] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 171, 94–10, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.023 [3] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 183, 36-60, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2018.12.009 [4] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys. 39 (4), 769–93, 2021. doi:10.5194/angeo-39-769-2021 [5] Prikryl P., et al., Atmosphere 12 (9), 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091186. [6] Gopalswamy N., Geosci. Lett. 3(8), 2016. doi: 10.1186/s40562-016-0039-2 [7] Tsurutani B.T., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 121. 10130–10156, 2016. doi:10.1002/2016JA022499 [8] Mayr H.G., et al., Space Sci. Rev. 54, 297–375, 1990. doi:10.1007/BF00177800 [9] Mayr H.G., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 104, 7–17, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2013.08.001 [10] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys. 27, 31–57, 2009. doi:10.5194/angeo-27-31-2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207