Novel evaluation of mass polar moment of inertia of the drive plate in resonant column
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resonant column (RC) is a standard laboratory test for the dynamic characterization of soils. Mass polar moment of inertia (MPMI) of the drive plate of RC is required for the solution of equation of motion for a specimen-mass system in RC. In standard procedure, the MPMI is evaluated by testing of calibration probes. Studies have shown that torsional stiffness of the probes have significant effect on the evaluation of MPMI of drive plate due to contribution from base of RC. The extent of contribution increases with increase in torsional stiffness of probes and consequently error in MPMI increases. This study presents a new calibration method that does not use probes. The MPMI of the drive plate is evaluated by suspension of drive plate with polyamide wire of negligible torsional stiffness and damping. The modified equation of motion is used to evaluate the MPMI of drive plate. Results show that the variation of MPMI with frequency is very small compared to its variation from conventional procedure. The apparent values of MPMI from conventional procedure are found to be higher than its inferred true-value, which results in overestimation of shear wave velocity of soil specimen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".