Human Diacylglycerol Kinase ε N-Terminal Segment Regulates the Phosphatidylinositol Cycle, Controlling the Rate but Not the Acyl Chain Composition of Its Lipid Intermediates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diacylglycerol kinase ε (DGKε), an enzyme of the phosphatidylinositol (PI) cycle, bears a highly conserved hydrophobic N-terminal segment, which was proposed to anchor the enzyme into the membrane. However, the importance of this segment to the DGKε function remains to be determined. To address this question, it is here reported an in silico and in vitro combined research strategy. Capitalizing on the AlphaFold 2.0 predicted structure of human DGKε, it is shown that its hydrophobic N-terminal segment anchors it into the membrane via a transmembrane α-helix. Coarse-grained based elastic network model studies showed that a conformational change in the hydrophobic N-terminal segment determines the proximity between the active site of DGKε and the membrane–water interface, likely regulating its kinase activity. In vitro studies with a purified DGKε construct lacking the hydrophobic N-terminal segment (His-SUMO*-Δ 50 -DGKε) corroborated the role of the N-terminus in regulating DGKε enzymatic properties. The comparison between the enzymatic properties of DGKε and His-SUMO*-Δ 50 -DGKε showed that the conserved N-terminal segment markedly inhibits the enzyme activity and its sensitivity to membrane intrinsic negative curvature, while also playing a role in the modulation of the enzyme by phosphatidylserine. On the other hand, this segment did not strongly affect its diacylglycerol acyl chain specificity, the modulation of the enzyme by membrane morphological changes, or the activation by phosphatidic acid-rich lipid domains. Hence, these results suggest that the conservation of the hydrophobic N-terminal segment of DGKε throughout evolution guaranteed not only membrane anchorage but also an efficient and elegant manner to regulate the rate of the PI cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".