MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283695780 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243162

Coronal mass ejection followed by a prominence eruption and a plasma blob as observed by Solar Orbiter

2022· article· en· W4283695780 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А. Бемпорад, V. Andretta, Roberto Susino, Salvatore Mancuso, D. Spadaro, M. Mierla, D. Berghmans, Elke D’Huys, A. N. Zhukov, Dana-Camelia Talpeanu, R. C. Colaninno, Phillip Hess, J. Koza, S. Jejčič, P. Heinzel, E. Antonucci, Vania Da Deppo, Silvano Fineschi, F. Frassati, G. Jerse, Federico Landini, G. Naletto, G. Nicolini, M. Pancrazzi, M. Romoli, C. Sasso, Alessandra Slemer, M. Stangalini, L. Teriaca

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryOffice of Naval ResearchU.S. Air ForceGoddard Space Flight CenterVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und EnergieUniversity of BirminghamAkademie Věd České RepublikyNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUK Space AgencyNational Center for Atmospheric Research
KeywordsOrbiterPhysicsCoronal mass ejectionCoronagraphAstronomyAstrophysicsSolar prominenceSolar windCorona (planetary geology)PlasmaAstrobiologyVenusExoplanetStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. On 2021 February 12, two subsequent eruptions occurred above the western limb of the Sun, as seen along the Sun-Earth line. The first event was a typical slow coronal mass ejection (CME), followed ∼7 h later by a smaller and collimated prominence eruption, originating south of the CME, followed by a plasma blob. These events were observed not only by the SOHO and STEREO-A missions, but also by the suite of remote-sensing instruments on board Solar Orbiter. Aims. We show how data acquired by the Full Sun Imager (FSI), the Metis coronagraph, and the Heliospheric Imager (HI) from the Solar Orbiter perspective can be combined to study the eruptions and different source regions. Moreover, we show how Metis data can be analyzed to provide new information about solar eruptions. Methods. Different 3D reconstruction methods were applied to the data acquired by different spacecraft, including remote-sensing instruments on board Solar Orbiter. Images acquired by the two Metis channels in the visible light (VL) and H I Ly- α line (UV) were combined to derive physical information about the expanding plasma. The polarization ratio technique was also applied for the first time to Metis images acquired in the VL channel. Results. The two eruptions were followed in 3D from their source region to their expansion in the intermediate corona. By combining VL and UV Metis data, the formation of a post-CME current sheet (CS) was followed for the first time in the intermediate corona. The plasma temperature gradient across a post-CME blob propagating along the CS was also measured for the first time. Application of the polarization ratio technique to Metis data shows that by combining four different polarization measurements, the errors are reduced by ∼5 − 7%. This constrains the 3D plasma distribution better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207