MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283696603 · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2022.44629

Crypto Currency Mining Farm for E-Vehicle using ML

2022· article· en· W4283696603 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sharon Candeda Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCancerCare Manitoba Foundation
KeywordsTollCurrencyElectric vehicleBusinessDiesel fuelOrder (exchange)Automotive engineeringTransport engineeringEnvironmental economicsFinanceEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Globally Travelling/ Transportation charge is getting to an extreme high due to the demand of non-renewable resources like Petrol & Diesel, Electronic Toll Collection and Vehicle Parking Expenses all leads to make the travelling cost unaffordable. In order to solve this problem, the automobile industry has proposed new ideas like Electric Vehicle which will replace the usage of existing high cost non-renewable resources like Petrol & Diesel, in the same way Automobile Industry proposes a new idea to reduce the Expenses of Electronic Toll Collection Charges, Vehicle Parking Expenses, and expenses like Electric Vehicle Charging Station Bills, In this proposed system hereafter all the next generation vehicles should come up with a new technology called Crypto Currency Mining Farm(CCMF) which will do Standalone Mining in the vehicle end and earn Crypto Currencies, This Crypto Currencies will be used for meeting all types of expenses for the Vehicle , it means Vehicle will earn Crypto Currencies and spend for all the listed expenses without disturbing the Vehicle owner which will make the cost affordable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologySame topicVehicle License Plate RecognitionFrench-language works237,207