Inhibitory relationships of resident bacteria isolated from the mantle fluids of <i>Crassostrea virginica</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thirteen aerobic, halotolerant marine bacterial strains were isolated from the mantle fluids and associated mucus of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica harvested from the highly impacted Black Rock Harbor in western Long Island Sound. All isolated strains were Gram negative and had previously been identified using 16S RNA gene sequence analysis. These 13 strains were examined for their ability to inhibit the growth of each other employing a diffusion agar method used by antibiotic assays. All challenger strains were able to inhibit at least one of the indicator isolates. Enhanced antimicrobial activity was observed from cultures of Pseudoalteromonas sp. (L), Shewanella sp. (H), Thalassospira sp. (JA), and Alteromonas sp. (JB) when used to challenge the indicator isolates. The indicator isolate most sensitive to antimicrobial activity was another Pseudoalteromonas species (KC) whose growth was inhibited by 10 of the challenger strains, whereas Pseudoalteromonas (L) was resistant to all growth challenges. Growth autoinhibition was observed with isolates Tenacibaculum ascidiaceicola (KC), Vibrio (B), and Shewanella (H) during a 24 h incubation. No antimicrobial growth inhibition was detected when 24 and 48 h cell-free extracts of these isolates were used to challenge indicator isolate growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".