Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a very preterm infant using high-frequency oscillation ventilation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a novel approach of ventilation, using high-frequency oscillation ventilation (HFOV), during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of a very preterm neonate. This case report highlights the importance of adequate lung inflation, which is a current topic, with neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommending a coordinated 3:1 compression:ventilation ratio during CPR. Our patient, a female infant born at 30 weeks gestational age, weighing 970 g, appeared floppy and apneic following birth in the amniotic sac. Lungs were unfolded and white-out in an x-ray done during resuscitation. The aim was to open lungs effectively using HFOV, instead of positive pressure ventilation, which was used unsuccessfully until the 7th minute of life. Heart rate continuously dropped below 60/min 15 min after birth and chest compressions with asynchronous HFOV were started, adrenalin was administered three times and surfactant was instilled endotracheally twice. It was possible to stabilize the patient after 15 min of CPR, following return of spontaneous circulation. HFOV may have enabled an alternative and rescue option of ventilation during neonatal CPR in this case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it