Upregulation of exonuclease 1 caused by homology-dependent repair confers cisplatin resistance to gastric cancer cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The homology-dependent repair (HDR) pathway is involved in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage response (DDR), which is crucial to cancer cell survival after treatment with DNA damage agents, including cisplatin (CDDP). Here, we explored the interactions between exonuclease 1 ( EXO1), a core gene in the HDR pathway, and CDDP resistance in gastric cancer (GC). Using bioinformatics analysis, we identified the HDR pathway as the most amplified pathway in DDR in GC. In addition, EXO1 was the core gene in the HDR pathway and showed the most significant amplification in GC. The amplification of EXO1 resulted in higher EXO1 expression in cancerous tissues, with malignant prognostic effects. Moreover, we upregulated or downregulated EXO1 in GC cells to examine its effects on the cell malignant phenotype and CDDP resistance in vitro and in vivo. The depletion of EXO1 inhibited cell proliferatory, migratory, and invasive activities, and provided apoptosis resistance to GC cells. EXO1 expression was elevated in CDDP-resistant cells. Ectopic expression of EXO1 increased the resistance of GC cells to CDDP, while downregulation of EXO1 increased the sensitivity of GC cells. Taken together, our study indicates that the HDR pathway is an important player in CDDP resistance in GC through the regulation of EXO1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".