Synthesis and structural characterization of copper–cuprizone complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copper(II) coordination by bis(cyclohexanone)oxalyldihydrazone (also known as cuprizone), resulting in the formation of an intensely coloured blue complex, was first reported over 70 years ago. The cuprizone reaction has been employed in colourimetric tests for the presence of trace levels of copper. Cuprizone administration in C57BL/6 mice also leads to demyelination over time - a consequence that appears to be due to copper dyshomeostasis - and this has led to use of cuprizone as the leading method for toxicant-induced generation of an animal model of demyelination since its first use in the 1960s. Despite broad interest in cuprizone and its ability to bind copper there have been relatively few studies to structurally characterize the copper coordination properties of this ligand. In the absence of an aqueous medium, such as neat alcohol, copper and cuprizone exclusively form an amorphous green precipitate. Under aqueous conditions, where a large excess of cuprizone (relative to copper) is present, the blue complex that is synonymous with copper-cuprizone coordination is predominantly formed. The blue and green copper-cuprizone products demonstrate poor solubility and present challenges for conventional structure characterization methods, such as X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. By combining mass spectrometry, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, computational chemistry, and other techniques, a self-consistent picture of the copper coordination structures of the blue and green complexes is revealed - confirming that the blue complex is in the Cu(III) state, containing two hydrolyzed cuprizone ligands per metal centre, while the green complex represents an extended oligomeric complex, comprised of repeating Cu(II) centres that lie 4.8 Å apart and are bridged by unhydrolyzed cuprizone donors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".