MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283733480 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(22)00119-0

The role of low-income and middle-income country prisons in eliminating hepatitis C

2022· article· en· W4283733480 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Matthew J. Akiyama, Nadine Kronfli, Joaquín Cabezas, Yumi Sheehan, Andrew Scheibe, Taha Brahni, Kunal Naik, Pelmos Mashabela, Polin Chan, Niklas Luhmann, Andrew R. Lloyd

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseMerck CanadaAbbVieGilead SciencesViiV HealthcareWorld Health Organization
KeywordsMedicineHepatitis CScopusTransmission (telecommunications)Viral hepatitisHepatitisGlobal healthHepatitis BHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)EpidemiologyVirologyEnvironmental healthPublic healthFamily medicineMEDLINEInternal medicinePathologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global health problem affecting 58 million people, 80% of whom live in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).1 In 2019, 1·5 million new HCV infections and 290 000 HCV-related deaths were estimated worldwide.2 One in two people who inject drugs has been exposed to HCV, and nearly half of incident HCV infections could be prevented if transmission risk due to injection drug use was removed.3 Mainly as a result of the criminalisation of substance use and the incarceration of people who use drugs, HCV is the most prevalent infectious disease in carceral settings worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Public HealthSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207