A unified metric for costing tailings dams and the consequences for tailings management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early-stage decision making on tailings disposal technology has significant and long-lasting impacts on mine economics and risk. The assumed favorable economics of slurried tailings disposal has had wide-reaching implications on the uptake of dewatered tailings technology such as paste thickeners, dry-stack and cyclone tails. This paper addresses the need for a comparable metric across tailings disposal options by the development of a financial model and unified costing metric which can be used during a mine's initial design choice and decision-making stages. The financial model developed estimates the actual cost of tailings dams in USD per dry metric tonne working within the framework of Canadian disclosure requirements. The method's utility is illustrated by applying the model to a case study of a Chilean copper mine. This case study demonstrates the usefulness of a unified metric for application in mine development proposals to improve the financial reporting transparency of TSFs. A unified cost metric would result in companies assessing their financial obligations more systematically, thereby promoting decision-making around alternatives to tailings dams in the longer term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it