The Making and Characterization of Edible Film from Jackfruit Seeds (Artocarpus heterophyllus L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study characterizes edible films from the starch of jackfruit seed (Artocarpus heterophyllus L.). It was found that the edible film had a thickness of 0.24 mm and 2.30 × 10-1 mm, tensile strength 8.35 × 10-5 N/mm2 and 2.56 × 10-4 N/mm2, elongation 49.19% and 30.33%, elasticity 1.69 × 10-5 and 8.44 × 10-5, pH 7.024 and 6.67, power absorption 75% and 50%, water vapor transmission 9.08 × 10-3 g/jam.m2 and 7.10 × 10-3 g/jam.m2. In this study, the edible film manufactured was biodegraded within 5 days. The FTIR spectroscopy did not identify any new functional groups. Furthermore, the shelf life of edible films used as potato coating is 4 days at room temperature and 6 days at cold temperatures. Therefore, the best treatment is using sorbitol and glycerol plasticizers at 1% concentration and jackfruit seed starch from the edible film at 3% concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".