MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-Time Pedestrian Detection Using Enhanced Representations from Light-Weight YOLO Network

2022· article· en· W4283746388 on OpenAlexaff
Shayan Shirahmad Gale Bagi, Behzad Moshiri, Hossein Gharaee Garakani, Mark Crowley, Pouya Mehrannia

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrian detectionComputer sciencePedestrianMinimum bounding boxArtificial intelligenceBounding overwatchObject detectionTask (project management)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pedestrian detection is one of the significant tasks in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs). There are two kinds of networks which are widely used for pedestrian detection: single-stage networks and region-based networks. Single-stage networks, such as YOLO, solve the bounding box regression and classification problems simultaneously which makes them faster than region-based networks such as Faster R-CNN. Nonetheless, the main structure of YOLO is too complex and slow for the pedestrian detection task in AVs and cannot detect small pedestrians. Furthermore, unlike region-based networks where all features of the region containing a pedestrian is used in classification, in YOLO only the features of a cell in which the center of anchor box lies is used in classification. In this paper, these issues related to YOLO will be addressed such that it can be better used for pedestrian detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT)Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207