MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283759136 · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.14131

Predators minimize energy costs, rather than maximize energy gains under warming: Evidence from a microcosm feeding experiment

2022· article· en· W4283759136 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew L. Meehan, Kurtis F. Turnbull, Brent J. Sinclair, Zoë Lindo

Bibliographic record

VenueFunctional Ecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPredationBiologyPredatorEcologyMicrocosmEnergy balanceZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Climate warming may alter predator–prey interactions and predator feeding behaviour due to increased metabolic demands. How predators meet these increased demands may depend on trade‐offs in prey energy content and body size, handling time and other functional constraints. We tested hypotheses associated with these trade‐offs with the predatory mite Stratiolaelaps scimitus , and three prey that differed in body size, energy content, and defenses ( Folsomia candida, Oppia nitens , and Carpoglyphus lactis ). We estimated metabolic rate, predation in choice and no choice feeding trials, movement rate, and lipid and protein content for all four species at 16°C and 24°C. We used these data to estimate the predator's energy demands and compared these to estimated energy intake in the choice feeding trials. Predators had greater metabolic demands at 24°C than at 16°C, but temperature did not affect predator or prey movement rates. Warming decreased lipid content, but not protein content, of all three prey species, leading to lower energy content for C . lactis and O. nitens , but not F . candida . In both feeding trials at 24°C, predators increased their feeding on the smaller, energy‐poor C . lactis , but not the larger, energy‐rich F . candida , resulting in lower estimated energy intake. S . scimitus did not feed on O. nitens at either temperature. Predators increasingly fed on small‐bodied prey under warming and not the large‐bodied prey despite the potential for greater energetic gains from larger prey. We posit that predators minimized energy lost during feeding through lower handling costs associated with C. lactis , rather than maximize energy gain. We conclude that selection of prey based on body size changes with temperature as a trade‐off for predators to balance increased metabolic demands. As predators provide top‐down control and regulate energy flow through the consumption of their prey, changes to predator feeding behaviour with climate warming may affect food web dynamics and ecosystem‐level processes. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFunctional EcologySame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207