MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283780054 · doi:10.47119/ijrp1001041720223498

Worksheets for the Improvement of Technical Drafting Skills of Electrical Installation and Maintenance Students

2022· article· en· W4283780054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research Publications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorksheetMathematics educationQuarter (Canadian coin)Component (thermodynamics)PsychologyAcademic yearComputer scienceGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study's goal was to assess the effectiveness of the developed Electrical Installation and Maintenance 9 worksheets, which were given to grade 9 students at Punta Integrated School in Calamba City, Laguna. The study specifically aimed to answer the following questions: First, what is the component level of the worksheets? Second, what is the worksheets' feature level? Third, what is the level of Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in terms of third quarter grade? Fourth, do the component of worksheet has significant effect on Academic performance of Grade 9 students? Lastly, do the feature o worksheet has significant effect on Academic performance of Grade 9 students? The descriptive method of research was used in this study. The respondents were one hundred thirty (130) students at Punta Integrated School who used and evaluated the worksheets. Based on the data gathered concerning the objectives of this study the following are the significant findings: (1) The component level of worksheets were all highly satisfactory; (2) Also the features level of the worksheet were all highly satisfactory; (3) In terms of third quarter grade, the level of Academic Performance of Grade 9 Electrical Installation and Maintenance students in terms of 3rd Quarter Grade was very competent; (4) The analyzed data revealed that the components of the worksheet had a partially significant effect on the students? performance; In addition to this (5) the features of the worksheet had a partially significant effect on students? performance. Based on the results above, the researcher came to the conclusion that the components of the worksheet in terms of learning objectives, content, and assessment had no significant effect on students? performance. While the components of the worksheet in terms of activities has a significant effect on students? performance. On the other hand, the features of the worksheet in terms of usability, consistency, aesthetic value and had no significant effect on students? performance and the features of the worksheet with regards to adaptability has a significant effect on the performance of the students. Therefore, the null hypothesis is partially accepted. Therefore it is recommended that TLE teachers may develop additional instructional learning materials based on the needs and interests of the students assimilated into other courses offered in Technology and Livelihood Education to enhance their skills in every situation they were in.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it