Worksheets for the Improvement of Technical Drafting Skills of Electrical Installation and Maintenance Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study's goal was to assess the effectiveness of the developed Electrical Installation and Maintenance 9 worksheets, which were given to grade 9 students at Punta Integrated School in Calamba City, Laguna. The study specifically aimed to answer the following questions: First, what is the component level of the worksheets? Second, what is the worksheets' feature level? Third, what is the level of Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in terms of third quarter grade? Fourth, do the component of worksheet has significant effect on Academic performance of Grade 9 students? Lastly, do the feature o worksheet has significant effect on Academic performance of Grade 9 students? The descriptive method of research was used in this study. The respondents were one hundred thirty (130) students at Punta Integrated School who used and evaluated the worksheets. Based on the data gathered concerning the objectives of this study the following are the significant findings: (1) The component level of worksheets were all highly satisfactory; (2) Also the features level of the worksheet were all highly satisfactory; (3) In terms of third quarter grade, the level of Academic Performance of Grade 9 Electrical Installation and Maintenance students in terms of 3rd Quarter Grade was very competent; (4) The analyzed data revealed that the components of the worksheet had a partially significant effect on the students? performance; In addition to this (5) the features of the worksheet had a partially significant effect on students? performance. Based on the results above, the researcher came to the conclusion that the components of the worksheet in terms of learning objectives, content, and assessment had no significant effect on students? performance. While the components of the worksheet in terms of activities has a significant effect on students? performance. On the other hand, the features of the worksheet in terms of usability, consistency, aesthetic value and had no significant effect on students? performance and the features of the worksheet with regards to adaptability has a significant effect on the performance of the students. Therefore, the null hypothesis is partially accepted. Therefore it is recommended that TLE teachers may develop additional instructional learning materials based on the needs and interests of the students assimilated into other courses offered in Technology and Livelihood Education to enhance their skills in every situation they were in.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".