MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283788554 · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvac060.027

Implementation of nurse-led early mobilisation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Identification of barriers to standardised practice

2022· article· en· W4283788554 on OpenAlexaff
Sandra Lauck, C. Bancroft, Maggie Yu, Tinca J. C. Polderman, Howard Andrews, A Stephenson

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSedationCohortContinuous variableAortic valvuloplastyEmergency medicineAortic valveCardiologyInternal medicineAortic valve stenosisSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background We examined the barriers of early nurse-led mobilisation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to support safe next-day discharge home. Methods We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of patients treated in 2019-2021 using a standardised post-procedure nursing care standard to promote mobilisation in 4 to 6 hours after TAVI. Results are presented as mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables and as number (percentage) for categorical data; student t test was used to compare continuous variables and χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. All analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute). Results The cohort included a convenience sample of 139 patients (64 women, 46%) mean age 82.5±6.7 years, NYHA III/IV 72 (51.8%), prior pacemaker 18 (13%), and prior SAVR 11 (7.9%). Patients were treated under local anaesthesia only (n=29, 20.9%) or conscious sedation (n=106, 76.3%) with a balloon expandable device (n=134, 96.4%) in a cardiac catheterisation laboratory (n=111, 79.9%) or hybrid operating room (n=28, 25.2%), and early recovery in cardiac telemetry (n=101, 72.7%) or critical care unit (n=38, 27.3%). Early mobilisation was achieved in 113 patients (81.3%: 4 hours: n=100, 71.9%, 4-6 hours: n=13, 9.4%); there were no significant (p≤0.05) differences in baseline characteristics between patients with early vs. late mobilisation; the primary reasons for delayed mobilisation included monitoring and/or managing cardiac conduction issues (n=6), vascular access hemostasis (n=6) and neurological status (n=4), patient preference or other self-reported issue (n=5) and nursing workload (n=5). In patients who achieved early mobilisation, 81.4% were discharge on post-operative day 1 and 86.3% by day 2, with 99.1% returning directly home. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between the two groups. Conclusions Early nurse-led protocol-driven mobilisation is safe and effective to facilitate rapid reconditioning and safe transition home after uncomplicated TAVI. Research is needed to better understand patient and systems-level enablers to improve standardisation of practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular NursingSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207