Ankle-Brachial Index and Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index as Predictors of Cognitive Decline Over Time After Carotid Endarterectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with carotid stenosis risk cognitive impairment even after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) because of the long-term presence of vascular risk factors. Early prediction of cognitive decline is useful because early appropriate training for impaired cognitive domains can improve their functions. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) are frequently used as general indicators of systemic atherosclerosis and are associated with cognitive function in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of those vascular biomarkers for predicting cognitive decline in patients after CEA. METHODS: Patients who had undergone both CEA at our institute and cognitive evaluations between March 2016 and January 2022 were invited to participate in this study. Associations between ABI or CAVI three years before baseline and cognitive function at baseline were assessed retrospectively in 94 patients, and associations between ABI or CAVI at baseline and three-year changes in cognitive functions were assessed prospectively in 24 patients. Cognitive functions were assessed using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (Cognistat). RESULTS: Low ABI three years before baseline was associated with poor performances on Cognistat and FAB at baseline. ABI, as a continuous measure, three years before baseline, showed positive linear associations with total Cognistat score and subscores for naming, construction, and judgment at baseline. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that the total Cognistat score, total FAB score, and subscores for attention and inhibitory control declined after three years. CAVI at baseline was negatively associated with three-year changes in total Cognistat score and subscores for naming, construction, and memory. CONCLUSION: Cognitive function can decline over time in patients with carotid stenosis even after CEA. ABI and CAVI might be useful to predict cognitive function and its decline among patients who have undergone CEA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".