ASPECTS as a clinical outcome marker for MCA infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy: Non-contrast CT versus CTA source images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background & Objective: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) in acute stroke has been widely used to demonstrate arterial occlusion. Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is used to detect early ischemic signs in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) in the middle cerebral artery region. We hypothesized that computed tomography angiography source image (CTA-SI) is superior to NCCT in predicting final infarct volume, 24 hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and 90-day clinical outcome. Methods: Patients who had an acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and treated with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were retrospectively evaluated. ASPECTS was evaluated by two experienced stroke neurologists in acute NCCT, CTA-SI, and follow up imaging. The final ASPECTS was compared with the mean baseline ASPECTS of NCCT and CTA-SI. The relation of both scores with 24-hour NIHSS and clinical outcome was compared. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was utilized to evaluate the 90-day outcomes. mRS score of 0-2 was considered a “good outcome”. Results: Fifty-three patients were evaluated. We observed a significant relation among CTA-SI ASPECTS and after treatment 24hr ASPECTS (y= -3.9 + 1.4 x; 95% CI, -7.6 to -0.2) (y= -26.04 + 3.5 x; CI, -41 to -10). The median baseline 24-hr NHISS was 6 (0 - 22). We found a better correlation between CTA-SI ASPECTS and 24-hr NHISS (y= 363.06 + -37.03 x; CI, -148 to 864) than between NCCT ASPECTS and 24h NHISS (y=529.80 + -62.55 x; CI, 180 - 829). Median 90 days mRS score was 2 (0 - 6). According to Deming regression analysis, the CTA-SI ASPECTS (y= 76.10 + -7.69 x; 95% CI, -36 to 188) was more consistent with the 90 day mRS compared to NCCT ASPECTS (y=149.86 + -17.67 x; 95% CI, 23 - 267) CTA-SI was superior in predicting 24hr NIHSS and day 90 mRS compared to NCCT ASPECTS. Conclusion: Prediction of CTA-SI ASPECTs is better than NCCT ASPECTs at 24hr NIHSS, 3-month mRS and final infarct size in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with tPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".