Evaluation of phytochemical, physicochemical and biochemical analysis of saaranai ver chooranam (the root of Trianthema decandra linn,)-a Siddha herbal medicine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abundant herbal remedies separately or in combination have been recommended in various medical treatises for the remedy of different diseases, Trianthema decandra Linn, (Family: Aizoaceae) familiarly known as Vellai Saaranai (Tamil) and Punarnavi (Sanskrit) is a procumbent herb widespread in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world, and also found abundantly in India. It has been widely known in different system of traditional medicines, used efficiently in Siddha for the treatment of diseases and ailments of human beings. The current study aims to endow up-to date standardized data of Saaranai ver chooranam (SVC) indicated for Gunmam with distinct observations such as physicochemical, phytochemical, biochemical, HPTLC, analysis of heavy metal, microbial load, specific pathogen, pesticide residue, aflatoxin parameters were evaluated as per PLIM guidelines, gathered and orchestrated in a prompt manner on this paper, to explore and inspire further ethno-botanical and ethno-pharmacological research and investigations towards drug discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".