Preclinical Evaluation of Recombinant Microbial Glycoside Hydrolases as Antibiofilm Agents in Acute Pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa can colonize the airways of patients with chronic lung disease. Within the lung, P. aeruginosa forms biofilms that can enhance resistance to antibiotics and immune defenses. P. aeruginosa biofilm formation is dependent on the secretion of matrix exopolysaccharides, including Pel and Psl. In this study, recombinant glycoside hydrolases (GHs) that degrade Pel and Psl were evaluated alone and in combination with antibiotics in a mouse model of P. aeruginosa infection. Intratracheal GH administration was well tolerated by mice. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that, although GHs have short half-lives, administration of two GHs in combination resulted in increased GH persistence. Combining GH prophylaxis and treatment with the antibiotic ciprofloxacin resulted in greater reduction in pulmonary bacterial burden than that with either agent alone. This study lays the foundation for further exploration of GH therapy in bacterial infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".