Design and Analysis: Servo-Tube-Powered Liquid Jet Injector for Drug Delivery Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current state of commercially available needle-free liquid jet injectors for drug delivery offers no way of controlling the output pressure of the device in real time, as the driving mechanism for these injectors provides a fixed delivery pressure profile. In order to improve the delivery efficiency as well as the precision of the targeted tissue depth, it is necessary to develop a power source that can accurately control the plunger velocity. The duration of a liquid jet injection can vary from 10 to 100 ms, and it generate acceleration greater than 2 g (where g is the gravity); thus, a platform for real-time control must exhibit a response time greater than 1 kHz and good accuracy. Improving the pioneering work by Taberner and others whereby a Lorentz force actuator based upon a voice coil is designed, this study presents a prototype injector system with greater controllability based on the use of a fully closed-loop control system and a classical three-phase linear motor consisting of three fixed coils and multiple permanent magnets. Apart from being capable of generating jets with a required stagnation pressure of 15–16 MPa for skin penetration and liquid injection, as well as reproducing typical injection dynamics using commercially available injectors, the novelty of this proposed platform is that it is proven to be capable of shaping the real-time jet injection pressure profile, including pulsed injection, so that it can later be tailored for more efficient drug delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".