MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284961969 · doi:10.1136/bmj.o1688

Beyond shame, sorrow, and apologies—action to address indigenous health inequities

2022· article· en· W4284961969 on OpenAlexaff
Janet Smylie, Ricci Harris, Sarah‐Jane Paine, Irma A Velásquez, Nimatuj, Raymond Lovett

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinetochoreCentromereSister chromatidsCell biologyChromosome segregationCohesinAnaphaseBiologySpindle checkpointGeneticsChromosomeCell cycleCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Chromosome segregation depends on a regulated connection between spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA. The kinetochore, a massive modular protein assembly, mediates this connection and also serves as a signaling hub that integrates and responds to changing cues during the cell cycle. Kinetochore functions evolve as the cell cycle progresses, culminating in the assurance of a persistent chromosome-microtubule connection during anaphase, when sister chromatids must transit into daughter cells uninterrupted. We previously determined the structure of the Ctf19 complex, a group of kinetochore proteins at the centromeric base of the kinetochore. We now present a high-resolution structure of a Ctf19 complex sub-assembly involved in centromere-microtubule contact: the Ctf3 complex bound to the Cnn1-Wip1 heterodimer. The resulting composite model of the Ctf19 complex and live-cell imaging experiments provide a mechanism for Cnn1-Wip1 recruitment to the kinetochore. The mechanism suggests feedback regulation of Ctf19 complex assembly and unanticipated similarities in kinetochore organization between yeast and vertebrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.015
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0060.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207