MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284976725 · doi:10.1190/int-2022-0001.1

Seismic reservoir characterization of the Gassum Formation in the Stenlille aquifer gas storage, Denmark — Part 1

2022· article· en· W4284976725 on OpenAlex
Satinder Chopra, Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Kenneth Bredesen, Kurt J. Marfurt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterpretation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsARC Resources (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferGeologyPorosityReservoir modelingSeismic attributeFaciesPetrologyOil shalePetroleum engineeringMineralogyGeotechnical engineeringGeomorphologyGroundwaterPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Seismic reservoir characterization plays an important role in carbon capture and storage analysis. The Havnsø anticlinal structure in Denmark is a prospective CO2 storage site due to its proximity to two large emission sources—a coal-fired power station and a nearby refinery. Although legacy 2D seismic lines over the area outline the anticlinal structure, their quality is insufficient for quantitative interpretation. Earlier studies have shown that the natural gas stored in the Stenlille aquifer exhibits a seismic response similar to the modeled CO2 fluid in the Havnsø structure. Thus, seismic reservoir characterization carried out on the Stenlille aquifer gas storage in terms of identifying spatial distribution of gas and outlining faults would provide insight regarding value addition that seismic data can bring into the proposed CO2 storage at Havnsø. Using the available poststack seismic data, we apply an integrated reservoir characterization analysis. After performing the adequate data conditioning, the impedance of the target Stenlille Formation is estimated through generation of an accurate low-frequency model. Thereafter, multiattribute analysis was used to generate volumetric estimates of porosity, gamma ray, and water saturation within the target formation so that the spatial distribution of gas can be mapped. The resulting porosity and gamma-ray volumes indicate encouraging results and were used for Bayesian classification to predict the probability of the more important lithofacies, namely, sand, shale, moderate-porosity sand, and moderate-porosity shaly sand, which enabled the mapping of high-porosity/facies zones in the two aquifer storage levels. Independently, we make use of unsupervised machine learning applications for seismic facies prediction and compare them at the two storage levels, which will be presented in the part 2 of this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it