Verification EVestG recordings are vestibuloacoustic signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Neural dysfunction is associated with aberrant nerve firing; thus, electrodiagnosis has the potential for objective diagnosis and quantification of neural dysfunction. Electrical stimulation alters nerve firing and may also have treatment potential. This article outlines some findings related to electrodiagnosis and electrical stimulation of the ear. The quasi-synchronous firing of many vestibuloacoustic nerve fibers can produce an extracellular potential defined as a field potential (FP). Electrovestibulography (EVestG) is a method to record vestibuloacoustic signals and detect the associated FPs. A clear picture of the muscle-, EEG-, saccade-related, or other artefactual origins, and the physiologic basis of FPs recorded with EVestG, is evolving. EVestG was applied to demonstrate the effect of electrical stimulation on spontaneous FPs in the ear canal. Methods: Bilateral EVestG recordings were conducted on 14 guinea pigs before and after stimulation with 3-0.5 mA ipsilateral anodal electrical pulses before and after ablation via unilateral Scarpa's ganglionectomy to elucidate the origin of the EVestG recorded spontaneous FPs. Results: Anodal electrical stimulation suppresses the recorded activity. There was a significant reduction of the level of recorded signal observed following anodal stimulation on the ablated but not the intact side. Conclusion: Electrical stimulation of the external auditory canal reduces spontaneous electrical activity in the ear canal, some of which is due to central nervous system activity. The EVestG recorded FPs have a major vestibuloacoustic component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".