MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285009242 · doi:10.36341/rabit.v7i2.2489

IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA C4.5 UNTUK KLASIFIKASI PRODUK LARIS SEPEDA MOTOR HONDA PADA CV CENDANA MOTOR CEPIRING

2022· article· id· W4285009242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRabit Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Univrab · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CV Cendana Motor Cepiring merupakan salah satu perusahaan penjualan sepeda motor merek Honda di Kabupaten Kendal. Persaingan penjualan sepeda motor yang ketat menuntut perusahaan untuk menentukan strategi penjualan yang tepat untuk dapat menaikkan penjualan dan pemasaran produk agar dapat menarik minat para konsumen. Dalam mengetahui ketertarikan konsumen terhadap produk motor Honda, maka dilakukan penelitian mengenai prediksi produk laris sepeda motor Honda dari setiap wilayah kecamatan di Kabupaten Kendal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah algoritma C4.5 decision tree dengan prosesnya menggunakan lima langkah pada KDD (Knowledge Discovery in Databases). Dari penelitian ini, menghasilkan klasifikasi dengan akurasi sebesar 99% yang menunjukkan bahwa algoritma C4.5 cocok digunakan untuk mengukur perkiraan penjualan sepeda motor Honda terlaris.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it