Stiffness Assessment and Lump Detection in Minimally Invasive Surgery Using In-House Developed Smart Laparoscopic Forceps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) incorporates surgical instruments through small incisions to perform procedures. Despite the potential advantages of MIS, the lack of tactile sensation and haptic feedback due to the indirect contact between the surgeon's hands and the tissues restricts sensing the strength of applied forces or obtaining information about the biomechanical properties of tissues under operation. Accordingly, there is a crucial need for intelligent systems to provide an artificial tactile sensation to MIS surgeons and trainees. This study evaluates the potential of our proposed real-time grasping forces and deformation angles feedback to assist surgeons in detecting tissues' stiffness. A prototype was developed using a standard laparoscopic grasper integrated with a force-sensitive resistor on one grasping jaw and a tunneling magneto-resistor on the handle's joint to measure the grasping force and the jaws' opening angle, respectively. The sensors' data are analyzed using a microcontroller, and the output is displayed on a small screen and saved to a log file. This integrated system was evaluated by running multiple grasp-release tests using both elastomeric and biological tissue samples, in which the average force-to-angle-change ratio precisely resembled the stiffness of grasped samples. Another feature is the detection of hidden lumps by palpation, looking for sudden variations in the measured stiffness. In experiments, the real-time grasping feedback helped enhance the surgeons' sorting accuracy of testing models based on their stiffness. The developed tool demonstrated a great potential for low-cost tactile sensing in MIS procedures, with room for future improvements. Significance: The proposed method can contribute to MIS by assessing stiffness, detecting hidden lumps, preventing excessive forces during operation, and reducing the learning curve for trainees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".