Unsettling the Settler Colonial Structure of Canadian Legal Education: An Examination of Three Law Schools’ Engagement with Reconciliation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indigenous law has a long and rich history in Canada, and it has played an important role in the formation of Canada's constitution.Unfortunately, the Canadian state has ignored and devalued it, treating it as less important than common law and civil law.In the context of Canadian legal education, law schools have, since the very beginning, been directed towards the study of common law and civil, at the exclusion of Indigenous law.This exclusion exists alongside other barriers for Indigenous law students, including racism and discrimination, isolation and culture shock, and stigma and feelings of powerlessness.In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada published its final report and 94 calls to action to advance reconciliation between the Canadian state and Indigenous Peoples.Two calls to action are aimed at legal education: call to action 28 calls for all law students to take a mandatory course in Aboriginal people and the law, and call to action 50 calls for the establishment of Indigenous law institutes.This study explores how Canadian law schools are engaging with reconciliation.Through the use of semi-structured interviews with faculty members and Indigenous law students at the University of Ottawa, Dalhousie University, and the University of Victoria, the study examines how participants conceptualize reconciliation and whether their engagement with reconciliation is consistent with the liberal or transformative approach to reconciliation.Employing an anticolonial framework, analysis of the data reveals that participants at all three law schools explain reconciliation, both as a general concept and in the context of legal education, in ways that are consistent with the transformative approach to reconciliation.The data also shows that all three law schools are on the path to implementing transformative reconciliation, but that much work remains to be done to unsettle the settler colonial structure of Canadian legal education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.088 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".