MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285043913 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15048

Anti-Cancer and Stress Response Pathway Effects of Nanosilver and Sodium Ascorbate

2022· dissertation· en· W4285043913 on OpenAlexaff
Shana J. Cameron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer cellAscorbic acidToxicityChemistrySodium ascorbatePharmacologyCancerOxidative stressBiochemistryMedicineFood scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanosilver (nAg) has superb antimicrobial, antiviral, antifungal, antiparasitic, and anticancer properties; and plays an important role in nanoscience, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine.Smaller nAg particles can enter cells and interact with the cellular components.The exposure dose, particle size, coating, and aggregation state, as well as the cell type or organism, are all large determining factors on the beneficial or toxic effects of nAg.Sodium ascorbate is a vital water-soluble antioxidant that can neutralize free radicals produced during illness.It has pro-oxidant effects in its oxidized form, and in this form is able to destroy cancer cells through the production of hydrogen peroxide.With the growing prevalence of cancer, there is an increasing need to find both new treatments and combinations of treatments to provide greater effectiveness.Nanosilver was found to be more toxic to HCT116 human colon cancer cells (24-hour EC50 of 78.43 ± 0.70 µg/mL) than to HIEC-6 human intestinal epithelial cells (no toxicity was observed for the treatment concentrations tested).Combined treatments of high dose sodium ascorbate with nAg demonstrated significantly increased toxicity to HCT116 cells as opposed to HIEC-6 cells, and increased the cell death from that observed with either of the treatments alone.The novel result was found that it is more toxic to cancer cells to use a combined treatment of high dose sodium ascorbate with low dose nAg; as opposed to low dose sodium ascorbate with high dose nAg, where a protective effect is seen.Nanosilver induced cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase in HCT116 cells, and combined treatment with sodium ascorbate further increased this effect.This was found to be a nAg-specific effect and did not occur with silver nitrate.Cellular oxidative stress was not induced by nAg, however, mitochondrial oxidative stress was induced in HCT116 cells after 24 hours of treatment.No significant effect on mitochondrial

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchFrench-language works237,207