MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285066772 · doi:10.54476/iimrj200

Integration of Action Civics Strategic Intervention Materials (ACSIM) for Improved Learners’ Performance in Araling Panlipunan 8

2021· article· en· W4285066772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Multidisciplinary Research Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Education Environments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivicsPsychologyQuarter (Canadian coin)Descriptive statisticsIntervention (counseling)Action (physics)Mathematics educationMedical educationMedicineStatisticsMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study aimed to integrate Action Civics Strategic Intervention Materials (ACSIM) in Araling Panlipunan 8 for improve learners’ performance at Dolores National High School. Specifically, it sought to: determine the profile of learner respondents; find out the perceived level of engagement on action civics activities; describe and interpret the pretest scores; identify the least mastered competencies; describe and interpret the posttest scores; and find out if there is a significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean scores of the learner respondents. Likewise, the researcher employed the descriptive method and designbased research in this study. Findings revealed that majority of the respondents were 14.38 years old; females; and, with the average family income of PhP.12, 667.30. The perceived level of engagement on action civics activities was found to be all together HIGH as to youth voice, youth expertise, learning by doing and reflection. The mean performance of the learner respondents’ scores in the pretest in AP 8 for Third Quarter before integration of ACSIM was found 16.05 with the verbal interpretation of AVERAGE. The Least Mastered Competencies in AP 8 for the Third Quarter were as follows: MELC # 3 - Nasusuri ang mga dahilan, kaganapan at epekto ng rebolusyong siyentipiko, enlightenment at industriyal; MELC # 4 - Naipaliliwanag ang kaugnayan ng rebolusyong pangkaisipan sa rebolusyong Amerikano at Pranses; MELC # 5 - Nasusuri ang dahilan, pangyayari at epekto ng ikalawang yugto ng kolonyalismo (Imperyalismo). The mean performance in the posttest in AP 8 for the Third Quarter after integration of ACSIM was found to be 25.03, with verbal interpretation of HIGH. More so, there was a significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean scores of the learners. It can be inferred that the integration of ACSIM has a large effect in improving the performance of learners in Araling Panlipunan 8. The pretest has served the purpose of a diagnostic test to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the learners. Lastly, subject teachers can make customized and user – friendly strategic intervention materials effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it