MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285070320 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3185557

SAR Despeckling Based on CNN and Bayesian Estimator in Complex Wavelet Domain

2022· article· en· W4285070320 on OpenAlex
Ramin Farhadiani, Saeid Homayouni, Avik Bhattacharya, Masoud Mahdianpari

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandCentre For Cold Ocean Resources EngineeringInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Speckle noiseSpeckle patternSynthetic aperture radarEstimatorNoise reductionShrinkage estimatorWavelet transformMaximum a posteriori estimationMathematicsBias of an estimatorStatisticsMinimum-variance unbiased estimatorMaximum likelihood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a hybrid algorithm for despeckling the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images using the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) denoising and complex wavelet shrinkage. In particular, we perform the speckle reduction process in the complex wavelet domain. We first despeckled the approximation complex wavelet coefficients using the MUltichannel LOgarithm with the Gaussian denoising algorithm (MuLoG) based on a pre-trained CNN model named FFDNet. Next, we despeckled the log-transformed details of the complex wavelet coefficients using the averaged version of the Maximum a Posteriori (AMAP) estimator. The experimental results on simulated and real SAR images showed that the proposed method achieved better speckle suppression in the homogeneous areas while preserving edges and point targets than other state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it