Mechanical deconditioning of the heart due to long-term bed rest as observed on seismocardiogram morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During head-down tilt bed rest (HDT) the cardiovascular system is subject to headward fluid shifts. The fluid shift phenomenon is analogous to weightlessness experienced during spaceflight microgravity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prolonged 60-day bed rest on the mechanical performance of the heart using the morphology of seismocardiography (SCG). Three-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), SCG and blood pressure recordings were collected simultaneously from 20 males in a 60-day HDT study (MEDES, Toulouse, France). The study was divided into two campaigns of ten participants. The first commenced in January, and the second in September. Signals were recorded in the supine position during the baseline data collection (BDC) before bed rest, during 6° HDT bed rest and during recovery (R), post-bed rest. Using SCG and blood pressure at the finger, the following were determined: Pulse Transit Time (PTT); and left-ventricular ejection time (LVET). SCG morphology was analyzed using functional data analysis (FDA). The coefficients of the model were estimated over 20 cycles of SCG recordings of BDC12 and HDT52. SCG fiducial morphology AO (aortic valve opening) and AC (aortic valve closing) amplitudes showed significant decrease between BDC12 and HDT52 (p < 0.03). PTT and LVET were also found to decrease through HDT bed rest (p < 0.01). Furthermore, PTT and LVET magnitude of response to bed rest was found to be different between campaigns (p < 0.001) possibly due to seasonal effects on of the cardiovascular system. Correlations between FDA and cardiac timing intervals PTT and LVET using SCG suggests decreases in mechanical strength of the heart and increased arterial stiffness due to fluid shifts associated with the prolonged bed rest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".