MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285091730 · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac8062

First wall power flux management during plasma current ramp-up on ITER

2022· article· en· W4285091730 on OpenAlexaff
R.A. Pitts, Y. Gribov, Jonathan Coburn, F. Javier Fuentes, G. Severino, G. Vayakis, Victor M. Amoskov, M. Brank, S. Carpentier, Gabriele D’Amico, M.L. Dubrov, F. Fernández-Marina, C. Jong, A. A. Kavin, R.R. Khayrutdinov, M. Kočan, E. Lamzin, A. Loarte, L. Kos, V.E. Lukash, N. Mitchell, A.R. Raffray, G. Simič, P.C. Stangeby, S. Sytchevsky

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Fusion · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTokamakLimiterPlasmaFlux (metallurgy)DivertorNuclear engineeringPower (physics)Fusion powerMaterials scienceMechanicsPhysicsAerospace engineeringComputer scienceNuclear physicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract On ITER, plasma start-up will be performed in limiter configuration on the inboard equatorial beryllium first wall panels (FWP). In contrast to most present tokamaks, however, this ramp-up phase will be comparatively long (∼10 s) and the use of actively cooled components means that power flux management is key if FWP lifetime is not to be compromised. Shaping of the FWPs is mandatory to ensure that leading edges do not appear between neighbouring units. For the ITER inboard panels, this has been optimized to account for the discovery in recent years on current devices of narrow scrape-off layer power flux channels for inner wall limited plasmas. However, the shaping results in power densities which are particularly sensitive to the overall ‘longwave’ (LW) alignment of the central column FWP ring with the structure of the toroidal magnetic field (TF), placing tight constraints on the target alignment. This target is currently based on a pure n = 1 LW alignment, but simulations of TF coil (TFC) locking upon energization show that, depending on the initial configuration of the gaps between the TFC inner legs, the field structure can be more complex. Although the TFC manufacture and machine assembly strategy is to make every effort possible to approach the ideal TF structure, an NMR sensor-based TF mapping diagnostic will be implemented to measure the field structure during the first plasma and engineering operation phase. An analytic framework has been developed and verified against numerical simulations to assess the capability for measurements from a set of discrete sensors located on the vacuum vessel inner column to be used to reconstruct the field structure at the FWP locations, a further ∼60 cm radially inward. In parallel with the alignment optimization and TF mapping strategies, modified ramp-up scenarios are also being designed which may be used to reduce inner wall limiter power fluxes if this proves to be necessary during operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear FusionSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207