MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285094013 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2021-0316

Modelling the effects of currents and migratory behaviours on the dispersal of Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) post-smolts in a coastal embayment

2022· article· en· W4285094013 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Brady K. Quinn, Marc Trudel, Brent M. Wilson, Jonathan Carr, Jason Daniels, Susan Haigh, David C. Hardie, James P. Hawkes, Christopher W. McKindsey, Mitchell O’Flaherty-Sproul, Émilie Simard, Fred H. Page

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalmoBiological dispersalBayFisherySmoltificationHabitatEnvironmental scienceEcologySalmonidaeBiologyOceanographyFish <Actinopterygii>GeologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The post-smolt phase is considered a critical period for Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar). Hence, identifying migration routes used by post-smolts is needed to protect the habitats they require to successfully complete their life cycle. We used a biophysical model coupled with output from a water circulation model (FVCOM) to simulate dispersal of Atlantic salmon post-smolts in a semi-enclosed bay: Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick, Canada. The model was run with nine post-smolt behaviours and six swimming speeds, and then tested against acoustic telemetry data. While no modelled behaviour entirely captured observed salmon migration routes, we identified some behaviours that could allow salmon to successfully leave the bay and resulted in predictions that matched observations reasonably well (e.g., swimming southwest, negative, or tide-varying rheotaxis). We could also rule out several behaviours as unlikely to be used by Atlantic salmon post-smolts in this area (e.g., passive dispersal, orienting based on salinity or temperature, and positive rheotaxis). Hence, with suitable behaviours and models, this approach can provide estimates of the essential habitats and migration routes of wild post-smolts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→