MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285099486 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550315

Selection Algorithm for Reducing IoT Service Delay in the Smart Factory

2022· article· en· W4285099486 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rawaa Ammar Razooqi, Hassan Jaleel Hassan, Ghaida Muttashar Abdel Saheb

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInnovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServerComputer scienceFactory (object-oriented programming)Cloud computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge computingScheduling (production processes)DigitizationReal-time computingComputer networkQuality of serviceEdge deviceAlgorithmEngineeringOperating systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The smart factory is a concept to express the ultimate goal of digitization in manufacturing. The most common definition of a smart factory is a highly digital store floor that collects and shares data on a continuous basis through connected devices and production systems. the proposed system focuses on reducing the delay by using hybrid computing, cloud, and edge servers. The purpose of this study is to investigate Real-time requirements using the Selection Algorithm. The factory is represented by a group of sensors that send data to three servers. (Two are edge servers with the same copies of data and rules, and the third is the cloud). When the sensor's reading reaches the edge servers, scheduling time an selection algorithm is implemented through which a single edge server receives data selecting the least delay the highest priority. Alternatively, if there is any problem or malfunction affects one of the edge servers, the second can complete its work without the need to stop the factory. In turn, the delay is reduced, and the factory performance is improved. When the delay time is reduced, the response time is improved and the service quality will be enhanced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicInnovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsFrench-language works237,207