Decentralized Resource Allocation-Based Multiagent Deep Learning in Vehicular Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resource allocation (RA) has a significant impact on vehicular network performance. With high mobility, RA is more challenging, as the number of vehicles in close proximity changes dynamically in the nonstationary environment. In this article, we propose a multiagent double deep Q-networks scheme to stabilize the system and maximize the sum-capacity of the vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) links, while satisfying the reliability and delay constraints for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) links. To avoid interference caused by unstable V2V links, a transmission mode selection is considered in the scheme design. In addition, we introduce a binarized weight algorithm to accelerate the deep neural network learning process and, therefore, improve the computational complexity of our scheme. Through extensive simulations and complexity analysis, we demonstrate that the proposed scheme yields excellent performance in terms of the sum-rate and probability rate of V2I and V2V communication modes. We also compare the proposed scheme with binarized weights with other algorithms in terms of accuracy evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it