Efficient Tensor Completion Methods for 5-D Seismic Data Reconstruction: Low-Rank Tensor Train and Tensor Ring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five-dimensional seismic reconstruction is receiving increasing attention and can be viewed as a tensor completion problem, which involves reconstructing a low-rank tensor from a partially observed tensor. Tensor train (TT) decomposition and tensor ring (TR) decomposition are two powerful tensor networks for solving this problem. However, updating core tensors leads to high computational costs in practical applications. We propose two efficient methods to exploit low TT-rank and low TR-rank structures by theoretically establishing the relationship between tensor ranks and matrix unfoldings, respectively. Specifically, the former uses a well-balanced matricization scheme, and the latter employs a tensor circular unfolding. Furthermore, we utilize the randomized parallel matrix factorization to accelerate the solution of these problems. Both synthetic and real data experiment demonstrates that the proposed algorithm can also achieve remarkable reconstruction performance; in the meantime, the computational cost is significantly reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it