MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285140247 · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3187597

3-D Structured Light Scanning With Phase Domain-Modulated Fringe Patterns

2022· article· en· W4285140247 on OpenAlexafffund
Xingjian Liu, Luhang Song, Mingkang Zhang, Te Li, Changhai Ru, Yongqing Wang, Yu Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhase (matter)Modulation (music)Phase modulationComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Frequency domainOpticsNoise (video)Phase-shift keyingArtificial intelligencePhase retrievalComputer visionAlgorithmPhase noiseImage (mathematics)MathematicsPhysicsTelecommunicationsAcousticsFourier transformDecoding methodsBit error rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing 3-D structured light (SL) scanning methods require a high number of images (multifrequency phase shifting, MF-PS) or embed signals in the space domain (space domain modulation phase shifting, SDM-PS) to conduct phase unwrapping. These methods are either movement sensitive (for MF-PS) or low in accuracy (for SDM-PS). In this work, a new 3-D SL scanning method is proposed to use the theoretical minimum of three images only. Unlike existing methods that directly embed signals in the space domain, the assistance signals are modulated in the phase domain of PS images, inspired by the phase-shift keying (PSK) theory. Phase calculation in the proposed phase domain modulation phase shifting (PDM-PS) method is independent of embedded assistance signals. The signal to noise ratio (SNR) of phase codewords and the accuracy of phase unwrapping and 3-D reconstruction are well retained. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed PDM-PS method using only three images was able to achieve comparable 3-D measurement accuracy as the traditional MF-PS method (three images vs. nine images, 0.03 mm vs. 0.02 mm); and both using three images, the proposed PDM-PS method outperformed the traditional SDM-PS method in terms of measurement accuracy (0.03 mm vs. 0.07 mm).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207