A hybrid genetic algorithm for the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with machine blocking and sequence-dependent setup times
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study contributes to the hybrid flow shop due to a lack of consideration of characteristics existing in real-world problems. Prior studies are neglecting identical machines, explicit and sequence-dependent setup times, and machine blocking. We propose a hybrid genetic algorithm to solve the problem. Furthermore, we also propose a mixed-integer linear programming formulation. We note a predominance of the mathematical model for small instances, with five jobs and three machines because of how fast there is convergence. The objective function adopted is to minimize the makespan, and relative deviation is used as a performance criterion. Our proposal incorporates two metaheuristics in this process: a genetic algorithm to generate sequences (the flow shop subproblem) and a GRASP to allocate the jobs in the machines (the parallel machines subproblem). The extensive computational experience carried out shows that the proposed hybrid genetic algorithm is a promising procedure to solve large-sized instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it