MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285171822 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2022/55378.16606

Folate Mediated One Carbon Metabolism in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

2022· review· en· W4285171822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaSystematic reviewMedicineOncologyCancerCarcinogenesisChecklistInternal medicineBioinformaticsHead and neck cancerMEDLINECancer researchBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is one of the most prevalent cancers of upper aerodigestive tract, with squamous cell carcinomas accounting for the majority of cases. Vitamin B such as folate has been associated with carcinogenesis. Folate is essential for one carbon metabolism, which involves the transfer of one carbon units for Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) production, amino acid metabolism and methylation. Aim: To evaluate the association of folate mediated One carbon metabolism with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). Materials and Methods: For this systematic review, Electronic bibliographic databases search of PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus was done. The electronic search was performed between November 15th to November 30th, 2020 by two researchers independently. All original research, observational studies, full text articles, in which blood samples or questionnaires or both, focused on the assessment of folate mediated one carbon metabolism in HNSCC, published upto November 2020 were reviewed. Four studies published from 2005 to 2019 were included in which three studies were case-control and one study was a comparative cross-sectional study. This systematic review was carried out by two reviewers, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and the New Castle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality assessment. Results: In this systematic review, total of four studies included, had 1504 HNSCC patients and 2970 Controls. One study was reported from Nigeria, one from the European countries, one from Japan, and one from the United States of America (USA). One study had a quality score of 8 whereas 3 studies had 7, considering all the four studies included are of good quality. Conclusion: Significant low levels of serum folate was present in HNSCC when compared to controls. Serum folate levels can differ due to tumor growth and subsequent metabolic changes, or they may precede and accelerate tumor progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.096
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.096
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it