Effectiveness of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate without diet vs. sennoside with diet in bowel preparation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: A three-day diet in bowel preparation before undergoing colonoscopy is an important factor that affects patient compliance. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate without a diet and rectal enema application protocol and conventional sennoside protocol before colonoscopy. Material and Methods: This is a prospective, single-centre, investigator-blinded, randomized study. A total of 60 patients were recruited: 30 in the sennoside group and 30 in the sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate group. All procedures were performed by an experienced endoscopist who was blinded to the bowel preparation protocol. The Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale was used by the endoscopist to assess the bowel preparation state. Results: The effectiveness of bowel cleansing regimens was similar in the entire, right, transverse, descending, and rectosigmoid colon according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (p>0.05). There was no difference between the groups in terms of cecal intubation rates, the detection of polyps, and the number of polyps. Discussion:The use of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate is an effective bowel cleansing agent and can provide both successful colonoscopy and patient compliance without a three-day fiber-free diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".